Re: BBDB v3 activity

Greg Bognar via List for discussion and development of BBDB for GNU Emacs <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.bbdb.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> My thoughts exactly---everything is in order.

Really?  When I open the BBDB User Manual, I find a one-chapter info document, with the
content:

1 First Chapter

This is the first chapter.

   Here is a numbered list.

  1. This is the first item.

  2. This is the second item.


Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with using BBDB, but I do remember what a pain it was to
switch from v2 to v3 many years ago, because there was, and apparently still is,
absolutely no documentation.

I don't think I would give BBDB a chance today and I suspect many potential users don't,
either, when there are well-documented alternatives.

So, I would not say everything is in order, even though I'll continue to use BBDB.

All the best,
Greg

> I also use BBDB and have been using it for many years. This is definitely a case of
> Einstein's first words. The anecdote goes that Einstein's parents were worried that he
> was four years old and still had not spoken. One day he said, "The soup is too hot." The
> parents, shocked, asked "Why didn't you say anything before this?" Einstein replied,
> "Until now everything was in order."
> 
> My thoughts exactly---everything is in order. 😁
> 
> > Bob Newell <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Aloha everyone,
> >>
> >> It's been two years since anything has been posted to this list so I thought I would
> >> recognize that anniversary :)
> >>
> >> However there is an actual purpose to this posting.  I remain an enthusiastic BBDB v3
> >> user, and it is vital to my email workflow.  Does the lack of activity on this list
> >> mean, or at least imply, that interest in BBDB has waned?
> >>
> >> I certainly hope not.  BBDB may be nearly feature complete (and adding whatever you
> >> may need on your own is always possible; I've done a lot of that), and relatively
> >> free of bugs, meaning that not much in the way of support and development is
> >> required.
> >>
> >> But I'd surely hate to see it slowly fade away!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.