Re: BBDB v3 activity
Greg Bognar via List for discussion and development of BBDB for GNU Emacs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bbdb.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> My thoughts exactly---everything is in order. Really? When I open the BBDB User Manual, I find a one-chapter info document, with the content: 1 First Chapter This is the first chapter. Here is a numbered list. 1. This is the first item. 2. This is the second item. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with using BBDB, but I do remember what a pain it was to switch from v2 to v3 many years ago, because there was, and apparently still is, absolutely no documentation. I don't think I would give BBDB a chance today and I suspect many potential users don't, either, when there are well-documented alternatives. So, I would not say everything is in order, even though I'll continue to use BBDB. All the best, Greg > I also use BBDB and have been using it for many years. This is definitely a case of > Einstein's first words. The anecdote goes that Einstein's parents were worried that he > was four years old and still had not spoken. One day he said, "The soup is too hot." The > parents, shocked, asked "Why didn't you say anything before this?" Einstein replied, > "Until now everything was in order." > > My thoughts exactly---everything is in order. 😁 > > > Bob Newell <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> Aloha everyone, > >> > >> It's been two years since anything has been posted to this list so I thought I would > >> recognize that anniversary :) > >> > >> However there is an actual purpose to this posting. I remain an enthusiastic BBDB v3 > >> user, and it is vital to my email workflow. Does the lack of activity on this list > >> mean, or at least imply, that interest in BBDB has waned? > >> > >> I certainly hope not. BBDB may be nearly feature complete (and adding whatever you > >> may need on your own is always possible; I've done a lot of that), and relatively > >> free of bugs, meaning that not much in the way of support and development is > >> required. > >> > >> But I'd surely hate to see it slowly fade away!