RE: Clean way of generalizing CDECL

"Stefan Boberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  Why do you want to generalize it? Isn't cdecl something very
win32-specific anyway?

/Stefan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Brian Hook
Sent: 07 July 2004 00:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: [GD-General] Clean way of generalizing CDECL

I'd like to be able specify CDECL in a cross-platform manner.  On most 
x86 compilers there's just the __cdecl keywod:

void __cdecl foo( int x, int y, int z );

GCC, of course, does it completely differently:

void foo( int x, int y, int z ) __attribute((cdecl));

So a simple #define won't work.  Now, you can do a kind of convoluted 
thing using a define, but damn, it's REAL ugly.

Is there a cleaner way of doing this?




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Gamedevlists-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-general
Archives:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_idU7


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Gamedevlists-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gamedevlists-general
Archives:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_idU7
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.