Re: Brown removed
"Peter J Richardson" <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:57:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <141d01c5b589$758e6360$6494fd3e@YOURF8C329D8D5> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Cuffaro" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 10:44 PM Subject: Re: [CAT23-Achat] Brown removed > Peter, > >> The above would depend upon the nature of the crime and the nature of the authority being >> wielded. I note that >> your former president was not removed from office when he was accused of sexual molestation. > > Clinton was never accused of sexual molestation - please don't start nasty rumours! Yes I had a mental block. I could not for the life of me pull out the word "harressment" out of my grey matter. > But anyway I think the operative word here is "indicted". These two officials were not just > accused, they were indicted, and I have to agree with Bill on this one. I wouldn't want a > policeman indicted for rape and out on bail walking my beat. No I probably wouldn't either. I did say in my reply to Bill that it did depend on the circumstances. I don't think that a policeman and a mayor are the same though, and Bill did not make clear he was talking about sexual crimes in his initial post. Regards Peter ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/7tRolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->