Re: Update
"David E. Cohen" <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:44:42 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.gm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <004a01c591d7$69e8ae60$74c1bd18@Dell> |
I agree with Randall's sentiments. There is a GM for every taste. Libby for example, is a very strict-constructionist GM, but she reviews orders in detail. Others, who are much looser, do not. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randall Shane" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:48 PM Subject: [CAT23-GM] Update > > You say that like it's a bad thing. > > If that's how Libby runs her games, and if the players are aware that > she will give a player a chance to clarify ambiguous prelim orders -- > well, it may technically be GM interference, but it's certainly well > within acceptable bounds. > > That's the beauty of human run games -- as long as the GM is fair, > flexibility can be allowed, and can help games run much more enjoyably. > > --- lgtennant <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry, Libby, but I would say that your return of orders to a player >> for clarification is totally uncalled for. IMO it is GM interference >> of the first order. You should simply accept them as is, publish >> them as is, and then give your interpretation of what they mean. Len >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: squirelibbymcafee >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 12:15 PM >> Subject: [CAT23-GM] Update >> >> >> Gentleman, >> >> Thank you all for your input. I would have responded sooner, but I >> >> have come down with a bug and am trying to get as much rest as >> possible. There were however a couple of questions raised that I >> at >> least should respond to. >> >> First, in the game I am running, the issues of whether or not the >> orders are ambiguous or not (I ruled both as unclear) is moot given >> the >> others orders submitted by the players opposition. For that I am >> thankful. >> >> Second, I believe one of you asked about instructions I may have >> provided in my house rules regarding the writing of orders. An >> expert >> from rule seven reads as follows: >> >> "The clarity and detail of submitted orders is up to the player. >> Brevity is discouraged. All submitted orders are to be written in >> agreement with the official rules (See Abbreviations). Variations >> that >> are without any vagueness of intent, or are with out ambiguity, >> will be >> acceptable. The GM will make no attempt to correct a player's >> orders." >> >> Third, I require prelims, as many of your know. One of the reasons >> I >> do so, is that sometimes I am able to catch a problem with a >> player's >> orders and suggest they re-examine what they have submitted. In >> this >> instance the player failed to meet the prelim deadline and >> therefore >> this opportunity was not available to me. I don't always look at >> orders, but in this game on at least two separate occassions I have >> >> prompted players to relook the orders they have submitted. >> >> As for the strict interpretation of the "English" language, in my >> personal opinion the point is moot if players do as I suggest and >> either write the orders in agreement with the game rules, or do as >> I do >> and submit the orders copied from the RP software. Granted, I can >> still submit an invalid order with RP, but at least the GM doesn't >> have >> to ponder the language, just the logic. >> >> Thank you all, >> >> Libby >> >> wnrytyrsd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Community email addresses: >> Post message: [email protected] >> Subscribe: [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: [email protected] >> List owner: [email protected] >> >> Shortcut URL to this page: >> http://www.onelist.com/community/CAT23-GM >> >> >> >> SPONSORED LINKS Role playing games Online role playing games Role >> playing games online >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS >> >> a.. Visit your group "CAT23-GM" on the web. >> >> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >> [email protected] >> >> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of >> Service. >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> > > > > Community email addresses: > Post message: [email protected] > Subscribe: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > List owner: [email protected] > > Shortcut URL to this page: > http://www.onelist.com/community/CAT23-GM > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >