Re: Solo AND alliance player
"Ray Setzer" <mczet-1urT0Is/[email protected]> Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:36:32 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.worldmasters.chat.wm2002 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002101c3ee72$79fca9f0$0600a8c0@Max> |
Ah, right. There was a fair amout of DB stuff lost when the old Cat23 server got hacked on, so we ended up recreating as best we could. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Len Tennant" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 2:01 AM Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Solo AND alliance player > I must be pretty dumb. The best I can find is the Round 1 results for > WM00 and WM99. I don't really know who made it to the semis so its hard > to test the solo target theory. > Len > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ray Setzer" <mczet-1urT0Is/[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 3:51 PM > Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Solo AND alliance player > > > You can check pretty easy. The DB's are at the WM headquarters: > http://www.worldmasters.net/portal > Go to the worldmasters tab and then subtabs for 00 and 99 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Len Tennant" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 3:34 PM > Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Solo AND alliance player > > > > Are there any stats on how many of the 7 finalists in the last WM > solo'd > > in Round 1 or 2? And how many of the 42 semi final losers had a solo > in > > Round 1 or 2? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ray Setzer" <mczet-1urT0Is/[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:26 PM > > Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Solo AND alliance player > > > > > > What should it matter who soloed or no in any prior rounds. Its not > like > > anything carrys over. > > > > You can argue that there really are no alliance players in the semi's > > since only one person from each board can advance. Its either top or > > your done. Perhaps a couple players may gang up on some prior solo > > getter, but I'd say that really had nothing to do with the solo, but > > rather that those players saw advantage in getting control of some > > section of the board quickly. And even with that in mind, its likely > > that the other players on the board will try and either scuttle that, > or > > take advantage of it in some other way. > > > > Its the semifinals man, you either bring your best game or you go > home. > > If your distracted by what someone may or may not have done in a prior > > round, your likely to detour from your best moves. > > > > Take Yann for example...please. I don't trust him any further than I > can > > throw a piano, but I do know that he won't engage in a pointless stab, > > he won't wander off topic seeking revenge from some real or imagined > > slight, but I also would be an idiot to leave open centers lying about > > where he can grab them. > > > > I predict that people will play the board as it lies, and won't give a > > rats behind about what happened in any prior round. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Peter J Richardson > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:40 AM > > Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Solo AND alliance player > > > > > > I suppose all this depends upon whether the soloist's ally throws > the > > solo. > > > > Regards > > Peter > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Andrew Stupple > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 11:28 AM > > Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Solo AND alliance player > > > > > > Good question. Of course, soloists from round 2 will argue that > very > > point, whilst others will argue that a soloist cannot be an alliance > > player by the very nature of the fact that he/she ruthlessly soloed in > > round 2 (or at least one in rounds 1 and 2). . > > > > > > > > Yann Clouet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Funny demarcation. > > Why would being an alliance player and a solo-goer be exclusive > ? > > > > (BTW hi to the list ;-) > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Andrew Stupple > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 11:20 AM > > Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Getting close: > > > > > > I'm not convinced that all players in the third round, will > have > > a passing aquaintance with solos themselves. There is probably just as > > many allinace players as ruthless go-getters, which will make the > semis > > very exciting. > > > > It's going to be a blood bath! > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > ---- > > BT Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and > > save £80 > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > ---- > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wm02-chat/ > > > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > [email protected] > > > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > > Service. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -------- > Yahoo! Groups Links > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wm02-chat/ > > b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > [email protected] > > c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > Service. > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/xTHqlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->