Re: Re: 2018 Meeple Choice Awards - Final Results

 Of the winners, I only voted for Quacks.  My gaming has taken a huge nosedive since I split with my partner of 8 years last august (combined with some other personal issues).  I've played Birmingham but the artwork is awful and the gameplay is similar enough to Lancaster that I didn't feel like voting for a "revised edition".  As for TEOTIHUACAN, I'm adding it to my list of games to try.  Unfortunately, since my heavy gaming opportunities are so limited, I probably will not be picking up a copy..  New Frontiers is the only one that got a fair number of votes that I haven't tried yet and want to try.  Lehmann's games are always interesting to try whether or not they end up working for me or not.
-Jimmy
    On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 02:38:19 PM EDT, Jacob Lee [email protected] [spielfrieks] <[email protected]> wrote:  
 
     

First of all, thank you, Larry, for maintaining the fun and the binding us gamers together with these awards.
I did not vote for any of the winners (becoming a trend) and I'm starting to wonder if it's too difficult to play a sufficient number of the nominees now.  I know I can't get to half of them.  A discussion on reprints may also be warranted.  I consciously did not push any reprints or expansions.  Obviously, others don't agree.  I really like Brass, but I refused to vote for Birmingham.  Same with Concordia.  I think there were a lot of games I excluded this way.  I hope I don't sound bitter because I'm not and I enjoy being surprised.  But my concerns are starting to become more pronounced each year.
Jacob
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 05:54, [email protected] [spielfrieks] <[email protected]> wrote:

     
No, I don't mind at all.  Discussion of the results is always welcome.  I'd love to hear what people think of the awards this year!

Larry