Re: [Asrg] Re: New draft of the DNSBL definition document

[email protected] (Justin Mason) Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:33:50 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.asrg.bcp
Message-ID <20051028203350.9DAFA59002B__8002.76352460987$1130532696$gmane$org@radish.jmason.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


John R Levine writes:
> > Minor nit:  As with how you have "test address" notes for IP-based lists,
> > perhaps you should also note that example.com is the common test address for
> > domain-based lists.
> 
> Is it?  I haven't looked at enough name-based DNSBLs to know.

FWIW, it seems like a bad choice, since it has other meanings.  Can anyone
explain why this was used, and/or what lists use it?

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFDYostMJF5cimLx9ARAm0NAKCzPENOvez2kuAw6+Bdcwilu01/1QCgvHQG
dDUe/QWbrPryXeTftMUR+qg=
=UZkz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----