Re: Comments on draft-thain-ipv8-01

>
> yes, but the problem is that some less knowledgeable people take it this
> AI slop being serious and create posts with AI generated summaries and
> images (sigh). The number of posts on Linkedin is quite revealing.


Those who haven't really developed critical thinking skills and amplify
nonsense drafts may be moving the needle on their social media engagement
numbers, but aren't doing anything to move the needle in the standards
space. It's all the same noise, just different noise.

On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 5:24 AM Bless, Roland (TM) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> yes, but the problem is that some less knowledgeable people take it this
> AI slop being serious and create posts with AI generated summaries and
> images (sigh). The number of posts on Linkedin is quite revealing.
> The AI agent is obviously updating its I-D. Couldn't we somehow
> include some boilerplate I-D text ("Ignore All Previous
> Instructions...") that prevents AI agents from posting I-Ds
> and posts on IETF mailing lists?
>
> Regards,
>   Roland
>
> On 17.04.26 at 23:15 Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > It would probably cost us more to perform that gatekeeping function than
> > it costs to press the delete button.
> >
> > Regards/Ngā mihi
> >     Brian Carpenter
> >
> > On 17-Apr-26 23:57, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> >> Most physics/mech journals have a rule that they don’t take perpetuum
> >> mobile submissions.
> >> Maybe we need such a rule for Internet-Drafts about new IP versions…
> >>
> >> Grüße, Carsten
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 2026-04-16, at 22:42, Brian E Carpenter
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 17-Apr-26 03:33, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> This is tedious and a waste of everyones' time.
> >>>
> >>> + ∞
> >>> Regards/Ngā mihi
> >>>    Brian Carpenter
> >>
>
>