Re: Complexity for case-sensitive systems
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.imaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 02:58 22/04/03, Adam M. Costello said: >We need to ask whether it makes sense to make any effort or any >compromises to support case-sensitive mail exchangers. Case-sensitivity >is discouraged by RFC 2821. Does anyone know of any case-sensitive >local parts that actually exist? As stated earlier, we carried serveral user inquiries. There seem to be a consistent demand for case-sensitivity in the mail exchanges (the way the mailbox is named is another yet similar type of response).. A simple example is the consistent desire to be able to be polite and able to send mails (and to see them received as such) to "M.le.Pésident@République.Française.gouv.fr" with the maximum of Windows like spaces, and a local abreviated DNS removing "gouv.fr" when not necessary or printing it in gray. Question seems to know if it is better to be consitent with 10 years old RFC or with coming 2000 years common polite practice based upon 7000 years of courteous scripting practice. Just a comment from the users. http://eurolinc.org jfc PS. I wish to come back on the "printing in gray" aspect. We added that question for fun in one of the questionnaires. We were surprised to see that it was very consistently checked as a real improvement.