Re: New issue 18: Threat discussion

Francis Dupont <[email protected]> Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:46:08 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.mobike
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

 In your previous mail you wrote:

      3) Unauthenticated attacker causes the IKE_SA to be
         closed by modifying just one or two IKE packets (if
         attacker can modify all packets, he can of course DoS).
   
=> I have a concern with this because it is not a MOBIKE threat
but an IKE one. I propose to rewrite it, adding for example
that MOBIKE should not add a new vulnerability (i.e., MOBIKE
should be as resillient as IKE, BTW this should be easy to do).

Thanks

[email protected]