Re: IETF Outcomes wiki
Michael MacFaden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>Come to think of it, the point ought to be on each page. So I've added it. Nice. thanks. >This is a rough consensus of subjective assessment. >In terms of assessing IETF productivity, the fact that something was a a huge >success is frankly more important than how large the market was. What matters >is that the IETF produced something that became popular. >The sort of adjustment based on age or market size could provide other sorts of >useful insight, but the keyword is 'other'. Good to know, would be useful to update the legend with how the values were/are being defined. If the size or kind of market isn't defined in the table, then the subjective value given is even less useful to come to a common understanding. ie What part of the elephant are you touching anyway? afaik, SNMPv3 has 100% adoption (nay popular) rate in [Euro-]DOCSIS based cable modem market, something less in US Gov't/Federal markets, and tiny in enterprise markets. Financial markets being the one wanting better security. Mike MacFaden