Re: MTS transparency and anonymity

On Mon February 28 2005 08:07, Charles Lindsey wrote:

> So we can consider how those requirements are met in the 4 cases:
> 
> 
>                 1. No From      2. blah.invalid 3. @[]          4. From <>
> 
> A. delivery     98% [1]         100%            98%             98%
[...]
> Clearly, this analysis shows that no solution is going to be perfect (but
> we knew that already). OTOH, it does seem to shown that #1 has worse
> problems than the others.

What it shows is that you can start from preconceived notions,
make up a bunch of random numbers unrelated to any sort of
testing or scientific basis, then say "See, it shows I was right".

Bollocks.