Re: Site policy vs. HELO

Typo Fix:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hector Santos" <[email protected]>
To: "ietf-822" <[email protected]>; "Vince Sabio" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: Site policy vs. HELO


> Vince,
>
> I would think section 7.7 inherently implies HELO to be included when it
> mentioned "EHLO." It might be a slip in not including HELO along with
EHLO.
> I think the principle idea was about site policy rejection code
> recommendation and using a 55x response code.
>
> The fallback response code is 50x which is the class of "unknown command"
> response codes. This is what you would normally expect for a non-ESMTP
host
> site who does not support or recognize HELO. See section 4.2.4 about 502
vs.
> 500.
>

I meant "....who does not support or recognize EHLO."

Sincerely,

Hector Santos, CTO
Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
305-431-2846 Cell
305-248-3204 Office