Re: MTS transparency and anonymity
Keith Moore <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I would like the rule to be that a null return path MUST only be used > for > an auto-response (which includes DSNs and other kinds of bounce) and > MUST > only be used with a recipient address which is the return path of the > message that triggered the auto-response. it's not going to happen. there are too many other kinds of messages for which a null return-path is valid, and this is an incompatible change to a protocol that has ~25 years of deployment. Keith