Re: MTS transparency and anonymity

On Sun March 6 2005 19:04, Tony Finch wrote:
> If you encourage people to use null return paths for normal messages and
> spam, then you eliminate the possibility of using something like BATV to
> detect collateral spam.

I assume that by "collateral spam" you are still referring to bounce
messages sent to joe-job victims.  If a null return path is used for
the original message, there is no "collateral spam", as there is no
bounce message.