Re: mail-followup-to / mail-copies-to
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Jakma <[email protected]> wrote: > We need some header to allow include-me-on-list-replies preference to > be expressed, just as the List-* headers allow MUAs to 'pick' which > address is the list address. There are several things that would be useful to be able to express. Here are the ones that spring to my mind right now: * What sorts of replies are allowed/encouraged: - Prefer private reply. - Prefer public reply. - Public reply is the only option (From address is bogus). - No preference. (Mailing lists may want to supply a preference if the author did not supply one, but they generally should not clobber the author's preference if one was supplied.) * Where private replies should go: - The From address vs. some other address(es). * Where public replies should go: - To the To/Cc addresses, or to some other addresses? (For example, replies to an announcement list might be directed to a discussion list.) - Should the private-reply address be excluded to avoid duplication (because the public-reply addresses already cover it), or included (because the public-reply addresses don't already cover it)? For a moment I thought about the ability to indicate that some of the To/Cc addresses should be excluded from public replies, but in that case, what are those addresses doing in the To/Cc field in the first place? What have I missed? > Well personally I think Mail-Followup-To is problematic. I'm confused by the Mail-Followup-To field in your message. It contains only your address, not the list address. Doesn't that mean that a "reply all" would go to you and nowhere else? Surely that's not what you intended? http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html I think you want both the list address and your address in Mail-Followup-To. AMC