Re: [2822upd] Resent-* MUSTard
Pete Resnick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06300008c25e4ca087d3@[216.43.25.67]> |
On 5/1/07 at 5:12 PM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > 2. Which Return-Path (2821 issue resurfaces); 2822 says "No other fields >> in the message are changed when resent fields are added", and taken at >> face value, that includes Return-Path. > >At the point where the redirection is done there isn't a >return-path, only an envelope. 2822bis does not and should not >discuss envelope issues - that's for 2821bis. This is the one thing on which I disagree with Ned. It is perfectly reasonable to resend post-delivery. In that case, you'll have Resent-* fields prepended to the message which may already have a Return-Path. It will get a new Return-Path when it is delivered to the mailbox in the Resent-To, and that will be the MAIL FROM of the resender. Maybe there's an argument for removing a Return-Path before prepending the Resent-* fields, but that's a different discussion. pr -- Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> QUALCOMM Incorporated