Re: SUMMARY: Limiting msg-id generate syntax

Pete Resnick wrote:
> 
> [Cc'ing our ADs just in case they didn't notice this.]
> 
> On 5/8/07 at 8:48 AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
>> Are we sure that the proposed changes would not require re-cycling 
>> RFC2822 at Proposed Standard?
> 
> I can't see why. The only real change here is to remove "no-fold-quote" 
> from the "allowed to generate" syntax for message ids. (Of course we 
> still require that they be interpreted.) I think this amounts to 
> "removing an unused/non-interoperable feature", which is a *desirable* 
> thing when moving to Draft.

ahh.  right.  merely dropping an unused construct.

i thought I was seeing suggestions for making real semantic changes.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net