Re: 2822upd-04 section 1 vs. section 4.1 discrepancy

Pete Resnick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID <p0625010bc3c26a3deac0@[192.168.2.1]>
On 1/26/08 at 10:08 PM -0500, Bruce Lilly wrote:

>Section 4.1 states in part:
>
>       Note: The "period" (or "full stop") character (".") in obs-phrase
>       is not a form that was allowed in earlier versions of this or any
>       other specification. [...]  In the future,
>       period may appear in the regular syntax of phrase.
>
>I suggest eliding the sentence in the note in section 4.1 which 
>begins with "In the future,".

I just noticed that the other day myself. Happy to have confirmation 
of my gut reaction to it. Will delete.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.