Re: 2822upd-04 "field" vs. "line"

Pete Resnick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rfc822
Message-ID <p0625010cc3c26e21d40c@[192.168.2.1]>
On 1/26/08 at 10:22 PM -0500, Bruce Lilly wrote:

>2822upd-04 section 2.1 states in part:
>
>       ...but instead always uses "header field" to refer to the
>       individual line and "header section" to refer to the entire
>       collection.
>
>"individual line" is technically incorrect.  Either "individual 
>field" (preferred) or "logical line" would avoid the difficulty.

Fine with me. Fixed.

>Section 2.2 begins with:
>
>    Header fields are lines beginning with a field name, followed by a
>    colon (":"), followed by a field body, and terminated by CRLF.
>
>I suggest beginning the sentence with "Header fields begin with a 
>field name at the start of a line," and continuing after the 
>existing text's first comma [same issue as above].

This change I don't like. The paragraph is defining header fields 
("Header fields are..."), not describing how they are formed ("Header 
fields begin with..."). Not only that, it is explained 2 subsections 
later that header fields are a logical line and how they can be 
folded. I don't think this general explanation will cause any 
confusion.

>Section 2.2.1 contains:
>
>    Semantically, unstructured field bodies are simply to be treated as a
>    single line of characters with no further processing (except for
>    "folding" and "unfolding" as described in section 2.2.3).
>
>I suggest changing "single" to "logical" [same issue as above].

Again, the reference to 2.2.3 I think deals with any possible confusions.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.