Re: 2822upd-04 "field" vs. "line"
Pete Resnick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p0625010cc3c26e21d40c@[192.168.2.1]> |
On 1/26/08 at 10:22 PM -0500, Bruce Lilly wrote:
>2822upd-04 section 2.1 states in part:
>
> ...but instead always uses "header field" to refer to the
> individual line and "header section" to refer to the entire
> collection.
>
>"individual line" is technically incorrect. Either "individual
>field" (preferred) or "logical line" would avoid the difficulty.
Fine with me. Fixed.
>Section 2.2 begins with:
>
> Header fields are lines beginning with a field name, followed by a
> colon (":"), followed by a field body, and terminated by CRLF.
>
>I suggest beginning the sentence with "Header fields begin with a
>field name at the start of a line," and continuing after the
>existing text's first comma [same issue as above].
This change I don't like. The paragraph is defining header fields
("Header fields are..."), not describing how they are formed ("Header
fields begin with..."). Not only that, it is explained 2 subsections
later that header fields are a logical line and how they can be
folded. I don't think this general explanation will cause any
confusion.
>Section 2.2.1 contains:
>
> Semantically, unstructured field bodies are simply to be treated as a
> single line of characters with no further processing (except for
> "folding" and "unfolding" as described in section 2.2.3).
>
>I suggest changing "single" to "logical" [same issue as above].
Again, the reference to 2.2.3 I think deals with any possible confusions.
pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102