| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
kalyani.oryx.com with esmtp id 1216840834-15340-215 for
[email protected]; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:20:34 +0200
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:18:43 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Intent to revive "expires" header from
draft-ietf-mailext-new-fields-15
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<1216822884.17711.202.camel@jmac>
In-Reply-To: <1216822884.17711.202.camel@jmac>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Jeff Macdonald writes:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 08:16 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>> "MUAs, Message Stores, and MTAs, MUST NOT delete a message on the
>> basis of an Expired header field unless given explicit instructions
>> to do so by the recipient."
>
> I find it very desirable to have MTAs generate a bounce if the message
> is older than the Expired header.
We already have an RFC specifying that, 2852.
Arnt