Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> Wed, 07 May 2014 12:10:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc822 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue 06/May/2014 19:34:52 +0200 Brandon Long wrote: > > OAUTH2 SASL is almost an RFC, but using it still has scaling issues > for clients, in that there is no discovery/registration protocol > yet. Theoretically, once all that is accomplished and implemented, > trying to authorize smtp-msa from one account to another via the > web would be as simple as an ACL pop-up that you can agree to. > > Clearly, that level of interop is a bit further away than we'd want > any solution to the DMARC issue. Except that OAUTH can also be used to authorize ML subscriptions with the participation of the subscriber's mail server. Knowing the [user, list] pair, the server can apply weak signatures or whatever other solution we'll find for the DMARC issue. Other advantages over COI include: * Define a folder to store list mail at subscription time, and * a real list of subscriptions, instead of a time-distributed database of reminders. Ale -- http://fixforwarding.org/ _______________________________________________ ietf-822 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822