Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs

Hi Alessandro,
At 03:06 07-05-2014, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>to "standardize" its syntax.[3]  It seems to me that eliminating some
>of such gratuitous changes is the solution to DMARC-for-MLs which
>minimizes the alterations in MLM software.  Are you sure it won't
>work?

This mailing list breaks the DKIM Signature.  Gratuitous changes to a 
mailing list message is a matter of opinion.  I suggest reading the 
past discussions first if you are interested in trying to make it work.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy


_______________________________________________
ietf-822 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822