RE: RAQMON Trap PDU size and report transmission time
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rmonmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155062BF003@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com> |
C:\smi\mibs\work>smidump -fsizes ./RAQMON-RDS-MIB # RAQMON-RDS-MIB module PDU sizes (generated by smidump 0.4.3) # size of PDUs for groups and rows: RAQMON-RDS-MIB raqmonDsNotificationEntry 16 [13..16] # size of one-shot row creation PDUs including columns with default values: # size of one-shot row creation PDUs excluding columns with default values: # size of notification PDUs: RAQMON-RDS-MIB raqmonDsNotification 214 [72..566] RAQMON-RDS-MIB raqmonDsByeNotification 214 [72..566] > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On > Behalf Of Andy Bierman > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 20:42 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [RMONMIB] RAQMON Trap PDU size and report transmission time > > > Hi, > > Does anyone know how many RAQMON-RDS-MIB varbinds can fit in > an unfragmented SNMP Trap PDU? (IPv4 as well as IPv6). > > It seems to me that all of the Basic report parameters should be > reported at least once per session, otherwise they shouldn't be > in the common parameter list. If the Basic report needs to be > fragmented into multiple Trap PDUs, then RDS complexity is > increased, and the likelihood goes up that a maximum transmission > rate of 1 Trap PDU every 2 minutes becomes a bottleneck on the RDS. > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > RMONMIB mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmonmib >