RE: RAQMON Trap PDU size and report transmission time

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.rmonmib
Message-ID <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155062BF003@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
C:\smi\mibs\work>smidump -fsizes ./RAQMON-RDS-MIB
# RAQMON-RDS-MIB module PDU sizes (generated by smidump 0.4.3)


# size of PDUs for groups and rows:

RAQMON-RDS-MIB          raqmonDsNotificationEntry       16      [13..16]

# size of one-shot row creation PDUs including columns with default values:


# size of one-shot row creation PDUs excluding columns with default values:


# size of notification PDUs:

RAQMON-RDS-MIB          raqmonDsNotification            214     [72..566]
RAQMON-RDS-MIB          raqmonDsByeNotification         214     [72..566]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 20:42
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [RMONMIB] RAQMON Trap PDU size and report transmission time
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone know how many RAQMON-RDS-MIB varbinds can fit in 
> an unfragmented SNMP Trap PDU?  (IPv4 as well as IPv6).
> 
> It seems to me that all of the Basic report parameters should be 
> reported at least once per session, otherwise they shouldn't be 
> in the common parameter list.  If the Basic report needs to be 
> fragmented into multiple Trap PDUs, then RDS complexity is 
> increased, and the likelihood goes up that a maximum transmission 
> rate of 1 Trap PDU every 2 minutes becomes a bottleneck on the RDS.
> 
> Andy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RMONMIB mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rmonmib
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.