RE: RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sigtran |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <849535E338E99741B7F7413F73253EDB051C01BA@us-nj-mail1.comverse.com> |
Brian, "did you look at the spec" Yes. You say AS is on the basis of PC. Do you mean OPC? Or DPC? Again, the way I understand this is that each AS must have a routing criteria based upon either OPC or DPC and then you can use LOADSEL for loadsharing the CIC ranges within the AS. Is that correct, or have I misunderstood? Regards, Lincoln -----Original Message----- From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:18 PM To: Haresign Lincoln Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sigtran] RFC 4666 M3UA - Reg Request Message Haresign, Yes, that is how it works. Load selections are defined within an AS. Therefore, the AS is on the basis of Point Code (and possibly SI=5). CIC ranges are defined as load selectors and load selections are assigned to ASPs serving the loadshare AS. So, all ASPs in this example AS would serve the same Point Code, but would be given traffic for different CIC ranges. Did you look at the draft? --brian Haresign Lincoln wrote: (Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:10:12) > Brian, > > Is it possible using LOADSEL (or LOADGRP) to have two different > Application Servers (not ASPs) handling different CIC ranges? Both AS > would share the same PC as the SG. > > Regards, > Lincoln > -- Brian F. G. Bidulock [email protected] http://www.openss7.org/