Re: An alternative to levies on copyright
João Miguel Neves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.law.eucd.ukcdr |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A Seg, 2004-02-23 às 20:08, David Haworth escreveu: > - if the publisher is the copyright holder, any law forbidding > exclusive licensing would be moot; the publisher would > grant himself a non-exclusive license and simply omit to > grant licenses to anyone else. You'd need to prevent > publishers from demanding that copyright be signed over lock, > stock & barrel, instead of merely being licensed exclusively. > Doesn't make sense to me. When can a publisher be the original copyright owner? I don't see that situation. > - there's also nothing to prevent the author from simply not > granting further licenses. Maybe under pressure from the > publisher (compare with Microsoft's pressure on PC makers > not to supply systems with alternative OSes). > I know. That's why the competing publishers would have to present a very sweat deal. The difference is not that they can also get the work, but that they would have a shot at it. And always remember that there will be a point on which MS won't be able to keep the pressure just because it doesn't make business sense to the PC makers. > > Downside: Works whose sales depend on huge marketing won't happen (no > > one will want to risk a huge investment if another intermediary can just > > come and collect the profits). > > You could permit a limited-time (say 5 years) exclusive deal, after > which the contracts become open again. > You could also insist that a work enters the public domain > if for a period of (say) 5 years it hasn't been continually > "in print" in some form (not difficult to do in these days of > e-books etc.) > > However, all this is simply patching and shoring up an already > seriously broken system. What's really needed is a complete > overhaul of copyright laws with emphasis on the public good, not > on private gain for a few publishers. That means: shorter duration, > fewer privileges for rightsholders, and the complete abolition of > pseudo-copyrights. However, short of outright warfare, I don't > see that happening any time soon. Too much money flows into > the coffers of political parties. > > Dave > > BTW If anyone doubts the economic viability of the public domain: > I bought a copy of Alice In Wonderland a couple of weeks ago. The > bookshop I went into in Erlangen didn't have one in stock, and > offered to order one. I lost count of how many different editions > were available, but there were at least 10. The cheapest was around > 3 EUR and the most expensive was around 25. I eventually settled on > a paperback volume with Wonderland & Looking Glass for about 8 EUR. -- João Miguel Neves
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAOzexGFkMfesLN9wRAvlZAJ4gweDv+QomSF0I6WhWEDxVAA3nZQCfXHiQ 7jZaPtqrVK79MKYrGf3K4nI= =sAVL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----