Re: [ACPI-sppt] ACPI patch
Micha Feigin <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2003 18:26:47 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.acpi.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 19:01, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> on 25/09/2003 11.53, Robert Vollmert wrote:
> > have you managed to apply it, yet? I tested it on 2.4.21+ACPI20030619,
> > and it applied cleanly (with some offsets). Is there any particular
> > reason you don't use the newer kernel and ACPI version?
> I manually patched the 20030619-patched 2.4.21 and then I created a
> patch that it seems working (I attached it). But now I'm always getting
> the same problem: if I disable 'Local APIC' sometimes the 'ACPI support'
> is reduced to just this choice (no modules and other stuffs). As if w/o
> 'Local APIC' I can't have complete ACPI support.
>
There is a bug in the config file. I raised that point some time ago.
iirc correctly it was fixed but don't remember since what kernel
version.
I think 2.4.22 is quite stable, but if you prefer 2.4.21 you will need
to change
drivers/acpi/Config.in
There is something about CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY enabled dependent on
CONIFG_LOCAL_APIC or something close.
If you want the most generic option and an else clause to that if:
else
define_bool CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY n
fi
this should solve you problem (you can email me the file privately if
you have problems since I don't have a copy to fix for you.
> I'm trying the new 2.4.22, but when I tried it one month ago I got some
> problem and as my 2.4.21 is more tested and it works perfectly, I stayed
> w/ it.
>
> Thx, bye,
> Gismo / Luca
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf