Re: [rock-user] Build report for ROCK 2.0.1

Am Donnerstag 10 Juni 2004 22:20 schrieb "Alex Bär":
> Hi Stefan,
>
> thanks for your reply. I'll give the latest Subversion revision a try in
> the near future, but it won't happen in the next two weeks, probably, as
> I'm on the road during that time. I'll post the contents of the log files
> you kindly pointed me to, once the new build is complete, then.
>
> BTW, the path to the log files appears to be
> build/<build-id>/root//var/adm/logs/<stage>-<package>.err.
>

Well, yes for Rock Linux 2.0.1. A somewhat different build directory layout 
was introduced with a later version.

> SuSE 9.1 software versions:
>
> gcc 3.3.3
> glibc 2.3.3
>
> Regarding the error logs, I'd like to know if there is a better way to make
> them visible than posting them on the users mailing list. The logs are
> pretty big, and not everyone might be happy to find such large messages in
> their inboxes. Can I post compressed attachments on this list? I'd prefer
> something like .tgj (bzipped tar) or .tgz (GNU zipped tar).
>
> Thanks, Alex

The best way is to upload the error logs to a web server, if you have some 
free space on one. Anyway, only lines around and after the command that 
caused an error are relevant in most cases. The list also accepts compressed 
attachments (at least devel does), but they should not be needed when posting 
only the last few lines of each .err log.

Yours,
Stefan Fiedler

>
> > Hi,
> > some hints that might help you get rid of some of the errors; maybe you
> > also
> > want to checkout latest subversion revision and take a look if the
> > failing packages have been updated/fixed.
> > Please also include the relevant output of
> > build/<build-id>/var/adm/logs/<stage>-<package>.err rather than console
> > output which is truncated to fit on the screen.
> > Btw. what versions of gcc and glibc does SuSE 9.1 ship?
> > Good luck,
> > Stefan Fiedler