Re: getfacl doesn't show same output as ls?

On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 21:08, Scott Mcdermott wrote:
>          $ getfacl thistestfile
>         # file: thistestfile
>         # owner: smcdermott
>         # group: qdn
>         user::rw-
>         user:smcdermott:rwx             #effective:rw-
>         group::r-x                      #effective:r--
>         mask::rw-
>         other::r--
> 
>          $ ls -l thistestfile
>         -rw-rw-r--+   1 smcdermott qdn             0 Jun  7 19:59
>         thistestfile
> 
> I do not understand why `ls -l' shows ACL_GROUP_OBJ having
> the write bit, but the "group::r-x" in getfacl(1) shows it
> without?

The group permissions in 'ls -l' show the ACL_MASK rather than
ACL_GROUP_OBJ.  The man page mentions this under the section
"CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ACL ENTRIES AND FILE PERMISSION BITS".

>  `ls -l' does show the ACL_USER_OBJ, ACL_GROUP_OBJ
> and ACL_OTHER permissions, correct? And is not the
> "group::r-x" the entry corresponding to the object's group
> (in this case group: qdn)?" I'm sure this is something
> simple I'm missing, does anyone know what?


_______________________________________________
acl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://acl.bestbits.at/mailman/listinfo/acl-devel