Re: Re: proposal to change IRC channel to #gentoo-GLI

Chris Gianelloni <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:47:43 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.gentoo.installer
Organization Gentoo Linux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 03:23 -0600, Matt Schneider wrote:
> > Rather than spend the time with a new channel, why not do what
> > #gentoo-releng has done and simply make the channel +m with the
> > developers (and any helpful users) with auto-voice.
> 
> Well the issue I see with doing that is the fact someone who is new to 
> the project or has just begun to take interest in it gains voice how? 
> For instance I just joined this list a matter of minutes ago and one of 
> the first things I did was pop into the channel. Perhaps it would have 
> to be a simple scripting of a delay before gaining voice. It would be an 
> annoyance, but almost all of the n00b types would get frustrated after 2 
> minutes and most likely leave. I know it is FAR from a foolproof 
> approach and there are many things wrong with, just trying to keep the 
> ideas flowing.

We have users in #gentoo-releng that hang out in the channel to follow
the discussion.  If they have something to say, they ask one of the ops
for voice, and we do give them voice.  We don't add them for auto-voice
unless they become a contributing member of the project, in which case,
we ask them if they want to become an official developer.  Simply look
at #gentoo-dev as an example of lots of users hanging out without a
voice.  It doesn't seem to be a problem there, or in #gentoo-releng.
The problem in #gentoo-installer is that the amount of noise is growing
quickly, and we fear that after the release of 2005.0, with the alpha
version of the installer, that the signal to noise ratio will be
unbearable and it will force the developers to create an entirely new
channel that is private just to be able to discuss development in real
time.  This would remove the transparency of development and create a
closed environment, which isn't what Gentoo is about.

Like I said, I'm merely pointing out observations that I have noticed.
The final action is totally up to the installer developers.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCME//kT4lNIS36YERAh6BAKC2kZaEnxcJ4UlE9ZUo4kxkjkQpSQCeKMDH
KD2hF9vebwf7dgNIUIA+z0o=
=TOwF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----