RE: ultramonkey and Bonding.

"Andersson Mattias" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, I believe this should work well. But in case it starts to be problematic for you I would like to recommend you to stop and reflect over the situation for a moment.

I mean, is it really really necessary to have extra redundancy in each machine when the system in whole is redundant on a machine level?

You could just put each of the load balancers in different switches and split up your resource machines between them to.

Some people would like to argue: the more configuration, the more sources of failure...

Keep it simple ;)

 

I am certainly not trying to talk you out of using NIC bonding, this is just a general tip to keep in mind and my 1 cent thought...

 

Hope you are successful in your project.

 

/Mattias

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian B. Ellsworth Capo
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ultramonkey and Bonding.

 

I gotta say that we use 3 LB using UM, and all off them use Bonding driver, but in our configuracion they all use the bonding mode=active-backup,  we haven't tried with other modes of bonding, but so far the activebackup works flawlessly... and you don't need anything special on the switches.

 

We use bonding to have a switch/NIC fault tolerant solution.

 

My 2c's

 

k.ellsworth

 

 

 

________________________________

De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de Terry, Jason
Enviado el: Lunes, 24 de Julio de 2006 15:17
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: RE: ultramonkey and Bonding.

Yes, it works great with bonding.

 

I remember there used to be a problem with arptables having a direct reference to eth0 but I think that has been fixed, if not simply change it in the batch file.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Euriel Gómez Raga
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 11:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ultramonkey and Bonding.

 

 

 

    Hi there... does anyone has worked with Bonding interfaces  ( bond0, bond0:0, bond0:1 ... etc.. ) and UM. does the ARP issue can be driven with arptables_jf ?

 

    Does anyone is working with this ?...

 

 

    Thanks in advanced.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Euriel Gómez Raga.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.