Re: RHEL 3 / UM 2.0.1 --> UM 3

Horms <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:35:29PM -0400, John C. Amodeo wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Recently, I've begun the process of upgrading my RHEL 3 boxes running UM 
> 2.0.1 to UM 3.0.
> 
> During the transition, I've noticed UM 2.0.1's custom kernel (rolled by 
> Horms, version 2.4.21-27.0.2.EL.um) uses LVS version 1.0.10.
> 
> The current RHEL R5 kernel (version 2.4.21-32.0.1.EL) uses LVS version 
> 1.0.8.
> 
> Some time ago, there was concern about a "jiffies bug" that existed in 
> 1.0.8.  In addition, it seems somewhat awkward to me that I am upgrading 
> to a more recent kernel that has an older version of LVS than what I 
> have been running (error free) for some time now...
> 
> I'm looking for comments from anyone regarding lost functionality / 
> stability /etc.. and whether or not this even makes a difference when it 
> comes to two node clusters...

The version of LVS in RHEL3 is a bit crufty - thats their call
not mine. However, in practice the main bug of concern that is
in that kernel is the jiffied bug you mention, and in 
practice that is not a problem as long as you load the
ip_vs module soon after boot and never remove and reinsert it.
This is what typically occurs on a production system, so
the jiffies bug is unlikely to be an issue.

-- 
Horms


-- 
Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body:
unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected]
where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.