Re: RHEL 3 / UM 2.0.1 --> UM 3
Horms <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.highavailability.ultramonkey |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:35:29PM -0400, John C. Amodeo wrote: > Greetings, > > Recently, I've begun the process of upgrading my RHEL 3 boxes running UM > 2.0.1 to UM 3.0. > > During the transition, I've noticed UM 2.0.1's custom kernel (rolled by > Horms, version 2.4.21-27.0.2.EL.um) uses LVS version 1.0.10. > > The current RHEL R5 kernel (version 2.4.21-32.0.1.EL) uses LVS version > 1.0.8. > > Some time ago, there was concern about a "jiffies bug" that existed in > 1.0.8. In addition, it seems somewhat awkward to me that I am upgrading > to a more recent kernel that has an older version of LVS than what I > have been running (error free) for some time now... > > I'm looking for comments from anyone regarding lost functionality / > stability /etc.. and whether or not this even makes a difference when it > comes to two node clusters... The version of LVS in RHEL3 is a bit crufty - thats their call not mine. However, in practice the main bug of concern that is in that kernel is the jiffied bug you mention, and in practice that is not a problem as long as you load the ip_vs module soon after boot and never remove and reinsert it. This is what typically occurs on a production system, so the jiffies bug is unlikely to be an issue. -- Horms -- Ultra Monkey - http://www.ultramonkey.org/ To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected], with a body: unsubscribe ultramonkey-users [email protected] where "[email protected]" is YOUR email address.