Re: apache-solr packaging?
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.jpackage.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOCN9ryX2BSBA4VAP73mLwCrysyLhL2Uo5GCq+3jG=s+_UJ3ng@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:34 AM, David Walluck <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/14/2011 04:10 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi Niko, >> >> are you creating a new rpm package for solr? >> I didn't know of any JPP apache-solr pakage so far, but we cold do it together, if you wish. > > I imported version 1.3.0 from Red Hat into the JPackage CVS. I didn't > find any pre-existing version. Thanks! That's a good starting point. There's an apache-solar-1.4.1 in Fedora 14, as well. I've worked from the Fedora 14 package on Fedora 15, and it builds nicely. On RHEL 6, it enters dependency hell with varios lucene dependencies and requires some JPackage 6 components not in RHEL 6, but the difference between the standard ".noarch" architectures and "x86_64" of RHEL 6.1's internal packages causes real RPM dependency adventures which I've not had time to pursue. On RHEL 5.x, it's dependency hell with sprinkles on top, even with JPackage 6 enabled. It's livinig testament to why the "we can just backport that to our stable OS" breaks down so badly when you try to use leading edge tools. And I'm afraid a lot of it is going to be wasted, because apache-solr-3.4.0 is out with a very distinct dependency tree.