Re: apache-solr packaging?
David Walluck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.jpackage.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/24/2011 07:18 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On RHEL 5.x, it's dependency hell with sprinkles on top, even with > JPackage 6 enabled. It's livinig testament to why the "we can just > backport that to our stable OS" breaks down so badly when you try to > use leading edge tools. And I'm afraid a lot of it is going to be > wasted, because apache-solr-3.4.0 is out with a very distinct > dependency tree. JPackage uses CentOS 5.x for its build system so you'll have to be more specific. The only dependency issue I am seeing there is that lucene-contrib-2.x is older in JPackage than in Fedora. I know that RHEL 5.x does not have conflicting Java packages in the base OS the way that RHEL 6.x does. If anything, I would expect more problems on 6.x. What is it that you're trying to do? Are you trying to install JPackage on top of Fedora? -- Sincerely, David Walluck <[email protected]>