[Fwd: Re: spring vs. spring - conflict in names]

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Miroslav Suchy <[email protected]>
To: Gilboa Davara <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: spring vs. spring - conflict in names
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:47:33 +0100

Dne 14.12.2011 16:26, Gilboa Davara napsal(a):
> Hello Miroslav,
>
> Unless there's another option, I'd rather not rename spring.
> Given the fact that it's already been included into Fedora and has a
> number of sub-packages (springlobby, spring-maps-default,
> spring-installer) it'll require me to jump through a number of
> bureaucratic hoops and force spring uses to redownload a number of
> packages.

It will only require re-review of spring itself, isn't it? Those other 
packages are not subpackages de jure. They are just package which 
require and are required by spring.
So those 3 package have to be "just" rebuild. And there is no need to 
re-review them.
Anyway - as Fedora packager and Fedora Sponsor, I can promise you, to 
help you with this bureaucratic hoops and do the re-review of package 
for you.
I'm even willing to rebuild those 3 package for you if you allow me to.

All of those packages, which require spring, are rebuilt once or twice 
per year anyway. So I do not see the re-download as big problem.

Miroslav Suchy