Re: skip mismatching check for pages requires the linux tarball
"Bruce Dubbs" ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) <[email protected]> Sun, 31 Aug 2025 01:12:11 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.automated |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/31/25 12:21 AM, Xi Ruoyao ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) wrote: > On Sun, 2025-08-31 at 17:23 +0800, Zhang Wen wrote: >> Since we're using patch tarball for the kernel in LFS > > No, we've not reached a consensus for that and to me we'll unlikely to > reach one (including but not limited to, I personally don't like to > complicate the book for "special use cases"). See > https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5785. The suggestion was made to use kernel patches, but we are not doing that. To me, the patches are for kernel developers as they are the only ones I can think of that routinely build new point versions of the kernel. I think it highly unlikely that they would have a slow internet anyway. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/alfs-discuss Unsubscribe: See the above information page