Re: skip mismatching check for pages requires the linux tarball

"Bruce Dubbs" ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) <[email protected]> Sun, 31 Aug 2025 01:12:11 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.automated
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/31/25 12:21 AM, Xi Ruoyao ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-08-31 at 17:23 +0800, Zhang Wen wrote:
>> Since we're using patch tarball for the kernel in LFS
> 
> No, we've not reached a consensus for that and to me we'll unlikely to
> reach one (including but not limited to, I personally don't like to
> complicate the book for "special use cases").  See
> https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5785.

The suggestion was made to use kernel patches, but we are not doing that.
To me, the patches are for kernel developers as they are the only ones I can think of 
that routinely build new point versions of the kernel.  I think it highly unlikely 
that they would have a slow internet anyway.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/alfs-discuss
Unsubscribe: See the above information page