Re: GNOME 49 and SysV systems (possibly affecting other DEs in the future too)
"Alexandru Mihai Buzduc" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Oct 2025 23:25:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAB_fJM724r-_ARBJjXcDrP5YzTCCpVpee2uGvQ3yQHi=nszxug@mail.gmail.com> |
The purpose of LFS is that it's supposed to teach you how a Linux system is built from the ground-up, and using automated build helpers to build a whole series of packages takes away from that. As I said before, you also have the issue of multiple packages depending on individual GNOME/KDE programs and libraries, which would eventually circle back to having individual chapters for both once again. Il Mar 21 Ott 2025, 22:28 jeremy wiig <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:16 AM Thomas Seeling < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I think for educational purposes the LFS book should constrain itself to >> sysV to demonstrate the purpose of an init system in an understandable >> and simple way. >> >> Since LFS does not *require* systemd it could be moved to BLFS as a >> prerequisite for some DEs. >> >> In fact this could lead to describe other init systems as alternatives >> as well. >> BLFS has instructions for multiple init systems, so it may also show >> systemd, openrc and whatever else is there, with a migration path from >> the LFS sysV way of doing things. >> >> Personally I'm very unhappy with systemd, I don't like it at all. I also >> don't like gnome, but not because of systemd :-) >> systemd started as a way to parallelize the startup services as much as >> possible, but it grew into a monster with more than a million lines of >> code. >> To me it looks like its own ecosystem on top of the Linux kernel, just >> like the saying about Emacs: "nice OS, terrible editor" :-) >> >> Stay healthy, >> Thomas >> -- >> "Do you wanna be a legend or a passing footprint on the sands of time?" >> -- >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > how about drop gnome (and kde) with maybe a couple short chapters where to > find support for the official build tools gnome foundry and kde-builder. i > think a main draw of LFS is to be lightweight with icewm or xfce. > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page