Re: dvd+rw-tools-7.1-consolidated_fixes-1.patch
"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List) <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2025 15:56:27 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2025-09-24 at 22:36 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:22:56 +0000 > "\"Ian Macdonald\"" ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Has anybody else had problems with whis patch? For me it fails with > > *** malformed patch at line 164: I can reproduce it and with a quick glance on the patch I'd say it's indeed malformed: diff -Naurp dvd+rw-tools-7.1.orig/growisofs.1 dvd+rw-tools-7.1/growisofs.1 --- dvd+rw-tools-7.1.orig/growisofs.1 2008-03-01 04:40:06.000000000 -0600 +++ dvd+rw-tools-7.1/growisofs.1 2025-08-06 15:24:52.394500633 -0500 @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ recordings. Actual device names vary from one operating system to another. We use \fI/dev/dvd\fP as a collective name or as symbolic link to the actual device if you wish. Under Linux it will most likely be an ide\-scsi -device such as "/dev/scd0." Under NetBSD/OpenBSD it has to be a +device such as "/dev/sr0." Under NetBSD/OpenBSD it has to be a \fIcharacter\fP SCSI CD\-ROM device such as "/dev/rcd0c." Under Solaris it also has to be a \fIcharacter\fP SCSI/ATAPI CD\-ROM device, e.g. "/dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s2" or "/vol/dev/aliases/cdrom0." And likewise in This doesn't seem correct. In the diff chunks of a patch the unchanged lines should start with a whitespace. -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support Unsubscribe: See the above information page