Re: dvd+rw-tools-7.1-consolidated_fixes-1.patch

"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List) <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Sep 2025 15:56:27 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2025-09-24 at 22:36 -0700, Alan Ianson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:22:56 +0000
> "\"Ian Macdonald\"" ([email protected] via blfs-support Mailing List)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > Has anybody else had problems with whis patch? For me it fails with
> > *** malformed patch at line 164:

I can reproduce it and with a quick glance on the patch I'd say it's
indeed malformed:

diff -Naurp dvd+rw-tools-7.1.orig/growisofs.1 dvd+rw-tools-7.1/growisofs.1
--- dvd+rw-tools-7.1.orig/growisofs.1   2008-03-01 04:40:06.000000000 -0600
+++ dvd+rw-tools-7.1/growisofs.1    2025-08-06 15:24:52.394500633 -0500
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ recordings.
Actual device names vary from one operating system to another. We use 
\fI/dev/dvd\fP as a collective name or as symbolic link to the actual
device if you wish. Under Linux it will most likely be an ide\-scsi
-device  such as "/dev/scd0." Under NetBSD/OpenBSD it has to be a
+device  such as "/dev/sr0." Under NetBSD/OpenBSD it has to be a
\fIcharacter\fP SCSI CD\-ROM device such as "/dev/rcd0c." Under Solaris
it also has to be a \fIcharacter\fP SCSI/ATAPI CD\-ROM device, e.g.
"/dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s2" or "/vol/dev/aliases/cdrom0." And likewise in

This doesn't seem correct.  In the diff chunks of a patch the unchanged
lines should start with a whitespace.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-support
Unsubscribe: See the above information page