RE: Question about TIOCSWINSZ

OK. For now I will handle this via a patch to readline where it defines 
TIOCSWINSZ itself if it is not already defined.

Regards,

Marvin Heffler
Linux Standard Base
IBM Linux Technology Center
11501 Burnet Road, Zip 905-7A017
Austin, TX 78758
(512) 838-0953    T/L 678-0953

"Wichmann, Mats D" <[email protected]> wrote on 09/16/2005 
10:02:23 AM:

> It was left out on purpose, and Stuart feels quite strongly about it.
> However, given the frequency of use, plus the symmetry with an
> ioctl we do have, I'm still not sure I'm convinced.
> 
> I have been working with the readline library adding it to the 
> appbat libbat in order for python to build properly on s390x and 
> have run into the situation where readline needs TIOCSWINSZ to be 
> defined in order to compile. We have TIOCGWINSZ in the spec, but not
> TIOCSWINSZ. Does anyone know if TIOCSWINSZ was left out on purpose, 
> or is it just an oversight?

_______________________________________________
lsb-spec mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-spec