Re: xts5 status, OSDL use

The failures of Xlib* section on my Suse Pro 9.3 are as followings:

/tset/Xlib12/sync/Test 2 FAIL
/tset/Xlib13/allwevnts/Test 20 FAIL
/tset/Xlib13/allwevnts/Test 24 FAIL
/tset/Xlib13/stpntrmppn/Test 3 FAIL
/tset/Xlib14/mbdstr/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib14/mbdtext/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib14/stlmod/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib14/uicfoc/Test 1 UNRESOLVED
/tset/Xlib14/wcdstr/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib14/wcdtext/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib17/gtdflt/Test 5 FAIL
/tset/Xlib17/wrtbtmpfl/Test 3 FAIL
/tset/Xlib3/clsdsply/Test 19 UNRESOLVED
/tset/Xlib3/srvrvndr/MTest 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib3/srvrvndr/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib3/vndrrls/MTest 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib3/vndrrls/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/ldqryfnt/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/lstfntswth/Test 3 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/lstfntswth/Test 4 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/qryfnt/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/qryfnt/Test 2 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/stfntpth/Test 1 FAIL
/tset/Xlib9/stfntpth/Test 2 FAIL

The failures of Xlib9 come from the problem while converting the files of
bdf to pcf, we can provide the pcf files before the real building work,
just
as what we did in VSW4.

You can find some patches in the attached files, others needed to be
further
investigated.

I'm very interesting in your results. 120 cases are listed as UNTESTED, so
I think you didn't set XT_X_RELEASE to be 6 in tetbuild.cfg. Can you sent
me your tetbuild.cfg and tetexec.cfg file?


Best Regards!
Rui Feng

(See attached file: diff.Xlib17.wrtbtmpfl.m)(See attached file:
diff.Xlib3.srvrvndr.m)(See attached file: diff.Xlib3.vndrrls.m)(See
attached file: diff.Xlib4.mprsd.m)(See attached file: diff.Xlib4.mpsbws.m)
(See attached file: diff.Xlib4.mpwdw.m)

Stuart Anderson <[email protected]> wrote on 2005-08-25 19:02:10:

> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Rui Feng wrote:
>
> >
> > Stuart Anderson <[email protected]> wrote on 2005-08-24 20:17:43:
> >
> >> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Rui Feng wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mats,
> >>>
> >>> I'm working on XTS5 now.
> >>>
> >>> Most of the failures he mentioned exist on my system.
> >>> Currently I'm investigating on the failures and trying to fix them.
> >>> Most of failures of Xlib* have been resolved
> >>
> >> Can you provide the details on these?
>
> What I meant to ask about, was detail on the resolution.
>
>
> > The results on Suse Professional 9.3 (xorg 6.8.2):
> >
> > Test suite version: 5.1.5
> > Specification version: Open Group Window Management (X11R5) document
set
> > Test run by: root
> > System: Linux linux 2.6.11.4-21.7-default #1 Thu Jun 2 14:23:14 UTC
2005
> > i686
> > Test run started: Friday August 19, 2005 02:44:05 PM
> > Test run ended:   Friday August 19, 2005 04:27:13 PM
> > Journal file: xts5/results/0002e/journal
> > TCC command line: tcc -p -e -v DISPLAY=:1.0 xts5 all
> > Report type: -d 1 -s 1
> >
> >
> >        CASES TESTS  PASS UNSUP UNTST NOTIU  WARN   FIP  FAIL UNRES
UNIN
> > ABORT
> >
> > TOTAL     996  5552  4334   123   651   268     8     0    45   123
0
> > 0
>
> Here are my latest results from the upstream xts5 on Debian Sarge w/ Xvfb
> from X.org 6.9 cvs.
>
>          CASES TESTS  PASS UNSUP UNTST NOTIU  WARN   FIP  FAIL UNRESUNIN
ABORT
>
> Xproto    122   389   267     2   120     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib3     109   161   129     3    28     1     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib4      29   324   273    15    27     5     0     0     0     4   0
0
> Xlib5      15    84    77     2     5     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib6       8    50    20     0    30     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib7      58   172   150     9    13     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib8      29   165   133    10    22     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib9      46  1472  1176    46    36   201     8     0     5     0   0
0
> Xlib10     23    95    58     2    35     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib11     33   195    87    22    43    43     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib12     27   138   108     2    15    12     0     0     1     0   0
0
> Xlib13     32   269   161     3   102     3     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib14     45    58    46     0     5     0     0     0     7     0   0
0
> Xlib15     45   159   126     0    33     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib16     30   105    82     1    22     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xlib17     55   131   110     0    21     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xopen       8   127   124     2     0     0     0     0     1     0   0
0
> Xt3        21    73    73     0     0     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt4        33   192    94     0    98     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt5        10    69    28     0    41     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt6         7    71    71     0     0     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt7        11   106    97     0     6     3     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt8         7    43    35     0     4     0     0     0     4     0   0
0
> Xt9        33   189   132     2    55     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt10        8    17    16     0     1     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt11       58   285   248     0    34     0     2     0     1     0   0
0
> Xt12       22    67    56     0    11     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt13       39   178   131     0    47     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt14        2    18    18     0     0     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> Xt15        1     2     0     2     0     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> XtC        29   147    90     1    56     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
> XtE         1     1     1     0     0     0     0     0     0     0   0
0
>
> TOTAL     996  5552  4217   124   910   268    10     0    19     4   0
0
>
>
>                                  Stuart
>
> Stuart R. Anderson                               [email protected]
> Network & Software Engineering                   http://www.netsweng.com/
> 1024D/37A79149:                                  0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
>                                                   BD03 0A62 E534 37A7
9149

_______________________________________________
lsb-test mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-test