Re: [OM Cooker] Are we still doing this moderation? Really?
Robert Xu <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:22:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel,gmane.linux.openmandriva.cooker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+K=-FcmHOizpDooK+E7OK76T7e_qrpf9a5qdjyO28q41ppdOA@mail.gmail.com> |
--f46d04428b0cdb3ea404e2e6ece6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 1, 2013 1:33 PM, "Rapha=C3=ABl Jadot" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If by association you mean Council, it is just a group of members having to represent all members, manage its treasury, hardware, legal stuff (including naming) and preparing the overall structure. Yeah, I meant Council. > > There were problems only with one person that was excluded from council from not respecting what was voted in it, (was a problem of behaviour), and I hope this is past now, if by "Association" you mean council, it has nothing to do with the moderation as cooker is autonomous. > > The association is part of groups that are intended to be autonomous. The development team (which is called historically cooker) is part of it, and apparently has difficulties to self-organize. It's not such big deal. There is no "crash" nor "screw" no reason to continue a drama here. > > > There is however to think at the next step to resolve these problems, and stop listening at legends and feeding them. I think we're having difficulties reaching this next step of resolving the problems. --f46d04428b0cdb3ea404e2e6ece6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <p dir=3D"ltr"><br> On Aug 1, 2013 1:33 PM, "Rapha=C3=ABl Jadot" <<a href=3D"mailt= o:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > If by association you mean Council, it is just a group of members havi= ng to represent all members, manage its treasury, hardware, legal stuff (in= cluding naming) and preparing the overall structure.</p> <p dir=3D"ltr">Yeah, I meant Council.</p> <p dir=3D"ltr">><br> > There were problems only with one person that was excluded from counci= l from not respecting what was voted in it, (was a problem of behaviour), a= nd I hope this is past now, if by "Association" you mean council,= it has nothing to do with the moderation as cooker is autonomous.<br> ><br> > The association is part of groups that are intended to be autonomous. = The development team (which is called historically cooker) is part of it, a= nd apparently has difficulties to self-organize. It's not such big deal= . There is no "crash" nor "screw" no reason to continue= a drama here.<br> ><br> ><br> > There is however to think at the next step to resolve these problems, = and stop listening at legends and feeding them.</p> <p dir=3D"ltr">I think we're having difficulties reaching this next ste= p of resolving the problems.</p> --f46d04428b0cdb3ea404e2e6ece6--