Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Wed, 5 May 2004 00:49:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination,gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 05:13:53PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 16:03, Axel Thimm wrote: > > The discussion is about Dag blessing a scheme as a standard and > > forcing other repos to either go with his scheme, or not be > > coexistable. Technically speaking he is obsoleting other people's > > packages. > > Is there another choice for items that can't co-exist? You mean like the way it was before Dag decided to obsolete the packages of other repos? :) Of course there is and the repos _can_ coexist, if the repo maintainers _want_ to have them coexisting. I want ATrpms to be coexisting with as many repos as possible, and I have about a dozen activated on my working machines just to make sure compatibility is ensured. There is no technical background to the whole issue (and thus no technical solution like subrepos, common repos and so on), which is why this is so sad. I still do hope that Dag will be convinced to drop his policy enforcement methods. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ repo-coord mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/repo-coord
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAmB3vQBVS1GOamfERAviTAJwN29evze5pZR7BZSvVBZrJzuEMngCfTpR2 ANfCx3C8edZ4M2jqy6T5PzU= =EFa6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----