Re: Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> 04 May 2004 16:19:24 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination,gmane.linux.freshrpms.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> However the issue here is the naming of kernel modules (almost everybody > agreed on using kernel-module-<name> for kernel modules and <name>-utils > for extra module-specific utilities). I'll make a list of repositories > with kernel-modules: > > kernel-module-<name>: > freshrpms (1 package) > dag (22 packages) > fedora.us (2 official, more non-official) > > <name>-kmdl: > atrpms (8 packages) > > <name>-kernel > planetccrma (1 package) Two packages in Planet CCRMA, actually (alsa and midishare). Don't pay attention to the naming scheme I'm using (dates back a long long time), I'll switch to kernel-module-<name> eventually[*] as it seems to most common. I'll keep using the "kernel version/release in name" after kernel-module-<name> as it is (AFAIK) the only method that currently works. -- Fernando [*] this will also mean, I guess, that /etc/apt/apt.conf has to be more specific in the Allow-Duplicated line, "^kernel-" would match all kernel modules even though they should not be duplicated when including the kernel version/release in the name