Re: SuSE Professional 8 vs SLES / Standard Server... what am I missing here?

[email protected] Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:15:57 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.domino
Message-ID <OFCFE59677.0EF038E8-ON8625707B.0044918C-8625707B.0053DBD0@cbsol.com>
First of all, Domino 7 supports SLES9, which is darned good news. 
Secondly, we have several Domino servers running on SLES9 and they run 
pretty solid. They're not in large sites, though. We have been waiting for 
official support to move to 64 bit, and take advantage of what D7, SLES9, 
will do for DWA performance. From a Domino perspective, SLES provides an 
excellent base for which you know you'll receive updates over a long 
period of time (what is it, 5 years?). This is where Pro isn't as 
desirable. 

IMHO, I wouldn't use 8 at all. But if the client is that insistent, inform 
them of the pricing. You don't control it, and they are the ones insisting 
on it. You cannot use 8.x Pro in this situation because they're insisting 
on supported versions, and Pro is not supported. IBM doesn't support 
non-enterprise versions of linux, to my knowledge. 

If you're worried about SLES8 being three times the cost of SLES9, I 
wouldn't. You'll spend more time figuring out the licensing and logistics 
than you than the difference in cost. It's not a bad product, but it's 
time has passed. I don't know if you can still get 8.x Pro updates, but I 
doubt it. 

Does that help at all? 


Jon Johnston
Creative Business Solutions
IBM, Microsoft, Novell/Suse, Sophos Consultants
http://www.cbsol.com
blog:http://bingo.cbsol.com

Adeleida Bingham <[email protected]> wrote on 09/13/2005 06:55:41 
AM:

> Hi all
> 
> I have researched this issue for days now, and I'm so glad I found 
> this list, I'm sure someone would be able to answer me.
> 
> I need to install Domino 6.5.4 at a client and recommended SuSE. Our
> own server has been running happily for three years now on 
> Professional 8, but, of course, the client needs the official deal 
> that is supported by IBM. Which is SLES 8 and SLES 8 only, it seems.
> I almost fainted when I got the pricing, not to mention the dancing 
> I have to now perform to my client, as I quoted them on SLES 9 
> pricing.... Apart from the fact that it is three times the price of 
> Enterprise Server 9, nobody can give me a straight answer on what on
> earth the differences are between the three 8 releases (SLES, 
> Standard Server and Professional), except for the fact that you 
> can't expect a sympathetic ear from Novell when your Professional 
> edition crashes (which is quite ok, as we will use external Linux 
> support anway). Standard Server sounds like an invention from space,
> which was dropped at version 9 'cause nobody could really say 
> exactly why it exists, apart from the fact that you can use it on 
> more than 2 CPU's (we have one CPU per box...). Please help out 
> here: what Bad Things will happen if I go ahead and recommend 
> Professional 8 to my client, as opposed to SLES 8. Also, access to 
> updates (8.1, 8.2) - can I download them with Professional or are 
> there limitations with regards to fix packs and other code maintenance?
> 
> And, where on earth does one get SuSE 8 at this point in time via 
> download anyway? 
> 
> Thank you VERY much for any help!
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Adeleida Bingham
> _________________________________
> phone:   +27 (0)21 671 4656
> fax:         +27 (0)866 829 128 
> cell:        +27 (0)82 8877442
> email:     [email protected]
> Skype:    adeleida1
> _________________________________
> Autumn Leaf IT cc (2002/085855/23)
> http://www.autumnleaf.co.za
> 
> E-mail disclaimer: http://www.autumnleaf.co.za/disclaimer
> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For 
> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]