Re: Hibernating in one computer and resuming in another
Noor <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Aug 2012 22:01:45 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.swsusp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMmEz3RW+LTq5Q6159zj2_Ui1QQ2+p9ONcWah8GxFuDDS-G7vA@mail.gmail.com> |
. On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Pedro Ribeiro <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This might be a silly question... But how feasible is it to hibernate > in one computer and then resume in another? > Assume both are the same architecture - x86-64 - but everything else > might be different, including the processor. doubt it would work unless the two systems are *exactly* identical. > > Background: > > with the recent advances in both technology and Linux, it's no longer > necessary to have my personal system linked to any one pc. I can have > a generic initramfs, large kernel image with all the modules and > Debian installation in a self contained fully encrypted disk. This > disk will be contained in a USB3/eSATA portable enclosure which I will > take anywhere with me. > > Now if I could hibernate in one computer and boot in another my plan > for world domination would get one step further... The final being > having it all contained in a 500gb USB5 pendrive. yes. it might be a good idea to carry just what belongs to us -- rootfs, data parittions & working image; & leave the hardware behind after use. At least thats what i thought of doing few years back with "susbix" (Suspend2 + USB + *nIX). but never pursued beyond some outdated helper script (http://sourceforge.net/projects/susbix/). the fact that there are not many practial usecases of "identical" hardware available everywhere (as user) was not very motivating either. but today if you consider a given An^H^H Linux tablet or so, it may be easier to be on another identical system elsewhere. better so in a controlled envronments, eg, like a classroom scenarios or so. -- Noor