Re: Media_Wearout_Indicator not working on Intel 520 SSD

Christian Franke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools
Message-ID <[email protected]>
stmailb-debian wrote:
> I have dire problems making my Intel 520 SSD report anything meaningful in terms of wear and tear.
>
> Media_Wearout_Indicator stays at "100" even after a year of extensive use in a server

Smartctl always prints the (normalized) attribute VALUE as reported by 
the drive. I don't know why the firmware author decided to report 100% 
even after extensive use :-)

You may want to ask the question in Intel forums:
https://communities.intel.com/community/tech/solidstate

Please also check "Percentage Used Endurance Indicator" of "SSD Device 
Statistics":
'smartctl -l ssd', included in '-l devstat', included in '-x'
(requires smartctl >= 5.42)


>   and Power_On_Hours shows "74285755253828" as the raw value.

74285755253828 = 0x4390000dc444

This device uses the power on time format of most SandForce based 
devices: The upper bytes contain a milliseconds counter. Smartctl does 
not print this correctly because the drive database is not up to date:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/Download#Updatethedrivedatabase

You could also try the '-v 9,msec24hours32' command line option.

But even then smartctl would print 0xdc444 = 902212 power on hours. This 
is a known firmware bug:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/smartmontools/wiki/FAQ#ThePower_On_HoursAttributeofmynewIntel520SSDreports890000hours
https://communities.intel.com/message/152232
https://communities.intel.com/message/156444

Thanks,
Christian


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.