Re: 'Naïve' indenting in the IDE

Chris Perkins <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:36:15 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.corman
Message-ID <[email protected]>
John,

I currently run Corman Lisp as an inferior Lisp using Emacs.  It's not as sophisticated as ilisp, but it works well enough.  There's no type-ahead, but indenting, lisp interaction, symbol menu, hyperspec integration, etc. are all working.

I believe I followed the directions from Bill Clementson that are on the CL-Cookbook, and I was inspired to do so by the previous postings on this list by Edi Wietz.   Edi, incidentally, was able to get ilisp to work and posted directions on this forum (in February 2003?)

Chris

At 11:15 PM 6/29/2003, you wrote:
>I think Corman Lisp is great, which is why I'm using it for my "killer 
>app." However, I need some sort of Lisp editing solution that (a) allows 
>interaction with the REPL, and (b) indents my Lisp source properly, where 
>"properly" is defined as "how Emacs does it when told to use the 
>common-lisp-indent-function." I've found syntax colouring pretty 
>habit-forming, as well.
>
>Given that I can't get XEmacs+ILISP to work with CCL (and I haven't seen 
>any reports of anyone else getting it to work either), I'm currently saving 
>my file in XEmacs and (load "...") it in Roger's IDE, and cutting and 
>pasting bits of text back and forth, which is definitely not the Right Thing.
>
>Seeing that others (i.e. Reini Urban) have hacked on this and apparently 
>run out of steam, I'm somewhat loathe to get too embroiled in ILISP & Elisp 
>myself, so I thought I would ask the list first:
>
>- what do people currently use to edit their Lisp source when developing 
>with/for Corman Lisp? If you use the IDE, does the lack of "proper" 
>indenting etc. really bug you?
>
>- has anyone managed to get (X)Emacs + ILISP + CCL working? If so, how? 
>(Luke, how did you get on?)
>
>- would anyone else really, really like Roger to add better indenting to 
>the IDE?
>
>Failing that, I'm considering trying to port ELI, after reading this: 
><http://lemonodor.com/archives/000461.html#000461>http://lemonodor.com/archives/000461.html#000461 (but I suspect it would 
>mean porting the sb-aclrepl as well).
>
>I don't mean to criticise ILISP or Mr. Urban or anything; I'm just trying 
>to see what my options are here.
>
>Cheers,
>
>John :^P
>
>--
>John Pallister
>[email protected] 
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1706441874:HM/A=1564415/R=0/SIG=11t6t7kdo/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mqso=60164784&partid=3170658> 
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Looking for the latest Free IT White Papers?
Visit SearchSecurity.com to access over 500 white papers.
Get instant access at SearchSecurity.com Today
http://us.click.yahoo.com/.lAzoD/QLNGAA/witMAA/SyjtlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/