Re: Is anyone else getting *four* emails for every closed ticket ?
Bernard Quatermass via Exim-dev <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Mar 2026 14:59:46 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/03/2026 14:25, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-dev wrote: > > I am now getting *four* emails each time Jeremy closes a ticket > - and not just ones to which I subscribed or participated. > > That is two each from > [email protected] > List-ID: exim/exim <exim.exim.code.exim.org> > and > [email protected] > List-Id: Exim MTA development list <exim-dev.lists.exim.org> > > For each list there is one email with the message from the closer > and another from a bot to say that the bug was closed. > > I see that I was listed on > https://code.exim.org/exim/exim/watchers > and will see whether disabling that that halves the number of emails. > > Since the new bug system can send emails whenever a bug is updated, > do we wish to rethink also sending them to/through > [email protected] > ? > This is expected behaviour with the current configuration. There are two factors involved here. The first is that the closing of a ticket is a distinct event from any final comment. This results in a pair of emails. There is no mechanism to change this, though there are a couple of forgejo tickets related to improving granularity of notifications, notably https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7461 The other factor is that to continue any utility with the exim-dev mailing list we have an "exim-dev-list" pseudo-user subscribe to the project in forgejo such that it receives all project notification emails and relays them into the list. This result in all current exim-dev list members continuing to receive ticket updates without creating accounts on code.exim.org. It might be argued that the more appropriate approach would be to retire exim-dev list entirely and rely on direct notifications to accounts on code.exim.org but this would constitute an even larger change in behaviour than any of the recent upgrades and require additional discussion. -- Bernard Quatermass
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 665 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsD5BAABCAAjFiEE1ECQ7VPv5RJcGfuc7SlahrYbLTUFAmmpmmIFAwAAAAAACgkQ7SlahrYbLTWL EAwAui7f+CL5pL8nFvNxxgmcrCYBzilN6+Eh5ipWhKye78L2eAcYmI9wHN72nZRJKmWYBWRhcQAg agSXvldBi3cyvBlD2snPZaM/OwW4hK3F/64dAhPvafvDQsEjVx/3asJdkj0JY/u7m1dSQTP97Dsm AyjnIAsSR3h10B8I9ZF4192nUaFkv3dU3J4q0daBSo1k7n03cvuLpjXtY5nVjumwQ5BQYxFKAlGa 43tk4wgfL8yzetBsidf6OMyix2MerJAofx2R7li82rtRQoqIk/AO7F1E/bY2hy5E9qLgnsdtj9EO ILtF3+C3wGCyDLWfviRZuehnIPhHeBdcARg9cm2lRxMuu2ATXvih2IeRz2tqutgBr2Kc5zzZHlIi tl7ZEexHVw3H1e1sQ7gnEzsT5bcVpf6TQsi2By8Fd9UB1tcRYHWxY2TCoNXmqsZcSD6qxKDraWCc TDJ719kFBuQKEvT24FL3QChNLm2fCSmUnb/M6J3070mlfkXsbvRVMPz1PuR6 =1D1G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----