Re: unspool_mbox and local_scan

Clive Goodhead wrote:

> Clearly, it would be useful to me, and 
> perhaps others who use both exiscan-acl and local_scan, if the 
> exiscan unspool_mbox function was called after the local_scan 
> code rather than before it.
> 
> I would be interested to know if Tom or anyone else has considered 
> this and, if so, whether or not there any problems with it.

Use "control = no_mbox_unspool" somewhere in the DATA ACL (of course, in 
a block that "succeeds"). But then you have to clean up yourself :)

I added this as a debugging goodie a while back. It was never 
documented, there just was a hint in the CHANGELOG.

/tom