Re: move-only-if-not-deleted
Ross <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.pine.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.WNT.4.64.0704100027210.-1675125@computer101> |
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Matt Ackeret wrote: ... > Anyway, the (as good as is possible) solution was to turn on > the feature [X] move-only-if-not-deleted > > Isn't that realistically exactly the same as simply choosing NO > for the following filter criterion > > Message is Deleted? = > Set Choose One > --- -------------------- > (*) Don't care, always matches > ( ) Yes > ( ) No Not the same as Pine Help explains. Plus one is contingent upon a move requirement, the other can be used without a move, & combined with other flags & parameters as observed in the filter section where it exists. I create filters to alter the flags only, no moving required, preparing messages to be sorted by other filters. Ex: I sometimes need to check for "important" flag or existence in "addressbook", & do not want a deleted message. There are several good options in that top section for filtering when you let your mind wander. It seems the "[X] move-only-if-not-deleted" selection you used is better for the application you required, as Pine Help explains: "Message Deleted Status Explained" "If you are thinking of using this part of the Pattern as a way to prevent messages from being filtered more than once in a Filter Pattern, take a look at the Filter Option "Move-Only-if-Not-Deleted" instead. It should work better than using this field since it will hide the filtered messages even if they are already Deleted. That option is at the bottom of the Filter configuration screen." Anyway, if several criteria were used, the deleted flag with another flag or two, then a difference would be realized. Otherwise why bother? -- RossARR [email protected] mrossarr.nixsyspaus.org/ ---end-of-message--- _______________________________________________ Pine-info mailing list [email protected] http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/pine-info